๐Ÿ“œ๐Ÿ–‹๏ธ

recant

a lot of people saw the Buckmaster/OpenAI story and immediately assumed OpenAI was in the wrong. if that was you, here's a place to come clean โ€” publicly, in your own words, on your own PDS.

the story: after the New York Times reported on Tristan Buckmaster's Navier-Stokes claims, plenty of people online concluded OpenAI's model must have been influenced by his work. OpenAI's own statement to the Times called that "categorically" impossible.
"On Wednesday evening, in response to questions from The Times, OpenAI said in a statement that it was 'categorically' impossible for its A.I. system to have been influenced by anything Dr. Buckmaster had done in the past two months."
read the NYT piece โ†’

sign & recant

sign in with bluesky to write your apology. it's written as a real record to your own PDS โ€” nothing is stored here.

the wall

0 recanted
reading the network for other apologies...

๐Ÿฆ‹ share recant